General Etiquette > Etiquette of the Rich and Famous

Putting the new wife's name on a building named for the deceased wife

<< < (7/8) > >>

Searcher:
Yeah, that's ugly.

If he wants to honor the new wife, he needs to do it with something that wasn't already named in honor of his deceased wife.  If he has kids by his previous wife, he's risking their permanent resentment.

caslyn:
I think the most practical thing to do would be to call it the *surname* building. Donor's names are represented, you don't have a long building name, and in the case of subsequent divoreces or deaths everyone can be represented (assuming that the surname is held in common by both partners). Any history of the building can give credit to both partners at the time of donation.

AlwaysQuizzical:
I think that's the best idea so far.

DuBois:


I love the picture of him and his new wife ::) What a class act.

zyrs:

--- Quote from: MurPl1 on December 01, 2011, 12:27:00 AM ---
--- Quote from: Winterlight on November 30, 2011, 12:52:18 PM ---I wonder how he'd feel if the situation was reversed- or if, should his current wife survive him and remarry, she does the same thing.

--- End quote ---

How fun would that last option be if she did and added her new husband?

It could go from:
the Mary and Bob Smith Bldg to
the Ann and Bob Smith Bldg to
the Ann and Jim Johnson Bldg

The university would *have* to love that right?  ;)

--- End quote ---

And if she passes away and he remarries, it could be the Ginger and Jim Johnson building.

If this sort of thing becomes a habit of entitled people all over, maybe all building names from donors should be placed on the building with those plastic letters with the magnets in them I remember from when my sisters were little.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page