News: IT'S THE 2ND ANNUAL GUATEMALA LIBRARY PROJECT BOOK DRIVE!    LOOKING FOR DONATIONS OF SCIENCE BOOKS THIS YEAR.    Check it out in the "Extending the Hand of Kindness" folder or here: http://www.etiquettehell.com/smf/index.php?topic=139832.msg3372084#msg3372084   

  • November 20, 2017, 06:23:14 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Grammar quirks  (Read 139641 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Trogdor

  • Member
  • Posts: 57
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #240 on: August 16, 2012, 12:20:15 PM »
A pet peeve of mine: Confusing than and then. One is comparative, the other is consecutive.

I see "I'm taller then her" and "He got out of the car, than I did" all the time.

Mental Magpie

  • Member
  • Posts: 4138
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #241 on: August 16, 2012, 12:46:40 PM »
A pet peeve of mine: Confusing than and then. One is comparative, the other is consecutive.

I see "I'm taller then her" and "He got out of the car, than I did" all the time.

TROGDOR!!!!! (sorry, it came unbidden! :-[ )

I hate that, too.  I have also heard it said incorrectly, which only makes it worse for me.

stitchygreyanonymouse

  • Member
  • Posts: 581
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #242 on: August 17, 2012, 09:04:54 AM »
It’s voilà.

Not wah-la. Not walla. Not viola.

Voilà.

I can excuse voila, if accents are beyond your technical capability.

(Or, when in doubt, just use English)

Elfmama

  • Member
  • Posts: 4595
  • Derailing threads since 2001!
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #243 on: August 17, 2012, 03:31:32 PM »
Overheard one last night that made me get stabby: "I and her don't get along."
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Common sense is not a gift, but a curse.  Because then
you have to deal with all the people who don't have it.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

Giggity

  • Member
  • Posts: 8342
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #244 on: August 21, 2012, 08:25:26 AM »
In the vast majority of cases, it's "simple," not "simplistic." I just saw that on another thread. "I used to think X was complicated, then I Googled it and it's so simplistic, I can't wait to try it."
Words mean things.

Thipu1

  • Member
  • Posts: 7439
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #245 on: August 21, 2012, 09:04:35 AM »
'Simplistic' isn't positive. 

I posted on another thread here about a pamphlet reviewing children's books.  The author consistently used 'simplistic' when 'simple' would have been correct. 

Some people think that adding a syllable or two makes their writing sound more sophisticated.  It doesn't. 

Another thing that irritates me is the phrase, 'a couple things' for 'several'.  'A couple OF things' is fine.



Editeer

  • Member
  • Posts: 303
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #246 on: August 21, 2012, 03:27:18 PM »
"It's in our/their DNA"--referring to a principle, practice, or custom of a company or team, or something they are committed to.
 "At XYZ Company, we care about quality. It's in our DNA."
"Our team gives 110%. It's in our DNA."
"The user experience is my highest priority--it's in my DNA!"

No. Brown eyes are in your DNA. Blood type is in your DNA. You are not responsible for them, and they do not reflect positively or negatively on you--they just are. A concern for customer service is something you can choose to have and to act on.

This one is really common where I work.  :P 
I wonder if anyone would say it at, say, a biotech company?  ;)


stitchygreyanonymouse

  • Member
  • Posts: 581
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #247 on: August 21, 2012, 03:32:52 PM »
I’ve come to the conclusion that I’d rather see apostrophe use die out than see another apostrophe carelessly plunged into a plural.

In the mean time, I cope by inserting attributes or words after the plural to make it be a possessive.

"All CD’s on sale!" becomes "All CD’s puppies on sale!" (not that it makes any more sense, but at least it is closer to correct grammar!)

Slartibartfast

  • Member
  • Posts: 10783
    • Nerdy Necklaces - my Etsy shop!
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #248 on: August 21, 2012, 04:44:48 PM »
"It's in our/their DNA"--referring to a principle, practice, or custom of a company or team, or something they are committed to.
 "At XYZ Company, we care about quality. It's in our DNA."
"Our team gives 110%. It's in our DNA."
"The user experience is my highest priority--it's in my DNA!"

No. Brown eyes are in your DNA. Blood type is in your DNA. You are not responsible for them, and they do not reflect positively or negatively on you--they just are. A concern for customer service is something you can choose to have and to act on.

This one is really common where I work.  :P 
I wonder if anyone would say it at, say, a biotech company?  ;)

DH works for a lab which does gene sequencing.  The answer is no, you don't hear this, but you do hear a lot of people gripe about it  :P

starry diadem

  • Member
  • Posts: 485
  • διάδημα: The Glass Hat
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #249 on: August 25, 2012, 04:56:09 AM »
I found these on LiveJournal this morning and thought I'd share:



Mysterious ravens go after local farmer's potatoes


CakeEater

  • Member
  • Posts: 3379
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #250 on: August 25, 2012, 11:38:02 PM »
'Simplistic' isn't positive. 

I posted on another thread here about a pamphlet reviewing children's books.  The author consistently used 'simplistic' when 'simple' would have been correct. 

Some people think that adding a syllable or two makes their writing sound more sophisticated.  It doesn't. 

Another thing that irritates me is the phrase, 'a couple things' for 'several'.  'A couple OF things' is fine.

Is the bolded a regional thing in the US? I read a series of books, which I really liked, but the characters were always grabbing a 'couple beers' or grilling a 'couple steaks' or making a 'couple phone calls'. I chose not to start on another series of that author's because it made my eyes sore.

Thipu1

  • Member
  • Posts: 7439
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #251 on: August 26, 2012, 09:01:14 AM »
I don't know if it's regional but it's getting more and more common in news reports and published non-fiction.  It's one thing to see it in novels.  It's quite another to find it in magazines and newspapers. 

CakeEater

  • Member
  • Posts: 3379
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #252 on: August 27, 2012, 05:13:43 AM »
I don't know if it's regional but it's getting more and more common in news reports and published non-fiction.  It's one thing to see it in novels.  It's quite another to find it in magazines and newspapers.

Very true.

crella

  • Member
  • Posts: 1262
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #253 on: August 27, 2012, 05:50:00 AM »
It’s voilà.

Not wah-la. Not walla. Not viola.

Voilà.

I can excuse voila, if accents are beyond your technical capability.

(Or, when in doubt, just use English)


Yes, my Gods where did 'wah-la' come from?

squeakers

  • Member
  • Posts: 1789
Re: Grammar quirks
« Reply #254 on: August 27, 2012, 07:03:04 AM »
It’s voilà.

Not wah-la. Not walla. Not viola.

Voilà.

I can excuse voila, if accents are beyond your technical capability.

(Or, when in doubt, just use English)


Yes, my Gods where did 'wah-la' come from?

Back in the day people wrote the above just to see how many people would immediately email in a correction (back when all there was were email lists) and it carried over to forums.  Nowadays? I don't know if people are still being silly or if they don't know the difference.

 http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=253486
"I feel sarcasm is the lowest form of wit." "It is so low, in fact, that Miss Manners feels sure you would not want to resort to it yourself, even in your own defense. We do not believe in retaliatory rudeness." Judith Martin