May is Melanoma Awareness Month! Check out more information in this thread : http://www.etiquettehell.com/smf/index.php?topic=77387
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I hear "sprinkle" and I admit, I think of something that's done in the bathroom that, depending on gender, one can do sitting down or standing up. Which makes the idea of a "sprinkle" as a modified baby shower rather unappealing.
"Passed on," "passed away" or "passed over" for "died"
Wonder whether "for free", is a tiresome trendy expression (or worse) for anyone else on the board?
Don't know if this has been mentioned: sprinkle, as in mini-shower. If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, then it's a duck. Or, in other words, it's a shower.
Quote from: Waterlight on March 06, 2013, 07:45:19 PM"Passed on," "passed away" or "passed over" for "died"I find this one annoying too, but only in certain contexts. If you are talking about someone who really did "pass away", as in, an elderly person who died peacefully in their sleep, then I am fine with it. But when people say things like "So and So passed away in the war", or when the death was otherwise violent, as in a car crash or homicide or sucicide, referring to those kinds of deaths with the term "passed away", it is really irritating to me.
I probably mentioned it upthread already but current use of the word "on" in phrases that it doesn't belong in:"Good on you" which should be "Good for you.""Hating on" which simply should be "hating"Especially when the user should know better.
With respect: re the former -- in my understanding, "Good on..." has been for well over a century, established Australian English as a congratulatory phrase: the way that is said there, what elsewhere is more usually expressed as "Good for...". It may not be patrician English, but it is for sure linguistic "standard operational procedure" in that part of the world. I'd think that Aussie participants in the forum would concur here.
Quote from: Venus193 on March 08, 2013, 12:05:26 PMI probably mentioned it upthread already but current use of the word "on" in phrases that it doesn't belong in:"Good on you" which should be "Good for you.""Hating on" which simply should be "hating"Especially when the user should know better.With respect: re the former -- in my understanding, "Good on..." has been for well over a century, established Australian English as a congratulatory phrase: the way that is said there, what elsewhere is more usually expressed as "Good for...". It may not be patrician English, but it is for sure linguistic "standard operational procedure" in that part of the world. I'd think that Aussie participants in the forum would concur here.
"Suck it up Buttercup"and"time to put on your big girl panties and . . . "Both sound dismissive and condescending IMO