News: IMPORTANT UPDATE REGARDING SITE IN FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT FOLDER.

  • May 24, 2018, 07:20:21 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Reading/Book Pet Peeves  (Read 1087516 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

starry diadem

  • Member
  • Posts: 494
  • διάδημα: The Glass Hat
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1140 on: August 08, 2013, 12:54:15 AM »
I've only just recently gotten into fanfiction (fanfiction.net and archiveofourown.org - are there other sites I should be tracking down?) but I can absolutely see how you'd get comments like that.  My first comment on my very first story was about when one of the characters does a magic spell - the commenter thought the flash of light should have been blue, not red, because of COURSE the character would use this other spell instead of the one I wrote.  (In a situation where both would have had the same result.)

I really can't see any other way to interpret that than "I know this fandom better than you do!"  Since then, I've had to suppress the urge several times to suggest if a particular commenter wants a story to have a specific plot, they're more than welcome to write it themselves - it's not like I own the characters!

Dreamwidth can be good if you're looking for a specific fandom - a lot of fandoms have prompt memes on Dreamwidth, where you can suggest ideas for stories and people might pick them up.

Be warned, the prompt memes can often be very NSFW

That's the main reason I migrated from fanfiction.net to AO3 - what's the point of fanfiction if there's no smut?   >:D


Other large multi-fandom archives include  http://www.adultfanfiction.net/     and  http://archive.skyehawke.com/ 

Both have large helpings of smut!



Mysterious ravens go after local farmer's potatoes


Cherry91

  • Member
  • Posts: 611
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1141 on: August 08, 2013, 03:02:35 AM »
For the FF people, I recommend FanficRants on Livejournal, which has many similar stories of people receiving comments trying to control the story, or just not getting it, as well as issues with Fanfics themselves. Very entertaining in a car crash fashion.

If there's a few fanfic writers/readers, maybe we could set up a separate thread?
All will be well, and all manner of things will be well.

magicdomino

  • Member
  • Posts: 5806
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1142 on: August 08, 2013, 09:26:26 AM »
The other was a weird ranty email from a guy who wanted me to have an adult character have sex with an underage character. I ignored him and he went away. He later became mildly infamous for demanding the same thing of many, many writers in that fandom, and would escalate when he was ignored rather than turn his attention elsewhere. I always wondered if he just hadn't yet completely lost his mind when he contacted me, and that's why he let it drop, or if he didn't think I was worth the effort of cyber-stalking to assure my obedience. I felt kind of insulted, really.

That's creepy.  I don't want to know what kind of fantasies he had.   :-\

goldilocks

  • Member
  • Posts: 865
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1143 on: August 08, 2013, 12:04:38 PM »
The thing I hate the most is when an author abruptly ruins characterisation to force the plot along.

Eg, in an awful lot of novels, the romance subplot will be a love triangle, or even a shape with more sides like that. Character A is admired by characters B and C, and the author makes both would be paramours attractive and likeable to justify A's struggle to choose.

Then A decides she likes B more, and so C becomes a total jerk to justify A choosing B.

This seems to especially be the case where the fans' favourite and the triumphant suitor aren't the same person...

If they have to do that, I wish they would at least set up what one commenter called The Other Guy (or Girl). So, C remains C, but D enters the picture, so we don't have to feel bad for C, because s/he has eyes for D by the end of the book.

It's a little over-neat as an  ending, but at least it keeps you from sobbing "But what about C???!?" when A and B drive off into the sunset (particularly if you were hoping for A to pick C, who is clearly the better partner).


Danielle Steel's books are the worst at this (at least they used to be, haven't read her in years).    Girl has 2 lovers -both are wonderful.  So, one of them will die and she winds up with the remaining one.

Drives me crazy!     This happened in at least 2 of her books.

AnnaJ

  • Member
  • Posts: 1021
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1144 on: August 18, 2013, 08:13:46 PM »
A synopsis of what drives readers crazy...and I relate to all of them:

http://www.buzzfeed.com/harpercollins/17-problems-only-book-lovers-will-understand-9npd

andi

  • Member
  • Posts: 2502
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1145 on: August 18, 2013, 08:34:22 PM »
Those are great!  All very true!  And I have an author that stopped mid series.

Piratelvr1121

  • Member
  • Posts: 9123
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1146 on: August 18, 2013, 09:31:01 PM »
Since we're on fanfiction and reviewers of such-

I'm not sure what's worse/funnier, the guy who reviewed one of my slash fics with "that's so g*y", or the chick to went and reviewed another slash fic of mine with a complaint about how horrible people were to be writing non-canon ships, as well as a list of ships that were canon and therefor acceptable*.

I was reading some fanfic that was clearly labeled as AU (alternate universe) and changed the fundamental nature of the relationship between two of the main characters. The writer had a whole series of these stories. Personally, they didn't work for me, but I love how creative and freeform fanfic can be, so I was cool with the basic idea. Why not try it, right? Well, another person who read them posted increasingly negative comments on them--basically, they just couldn't see that relationship actually happening that way, and since the writer had "some talent," they should really just try writing the relationship as it was in canon.  :o

I thought that was a pretty awful thing to say, about free stories that no one has to read.

Agreed.  I mean Pirates of the Caribbean is my fandom and both my bff and I like the shippings as the were in the movies.  Will with Elizabeth and neither of us care for "Sparrabeth".  But because of that, we just don't read it! If it says in the summary that's what ship the author's going with, we don't click on it! It's that easy!

I've come across authors having "Challenges" from other authors, and my friend did one, I think writing Jack as he'd react to a certain situation, and it turned out to be funny while keeping him in character.  I think challenges can be fun and good for stretching one's writing muscles, but rudely insisting someone write a character into certain situations or implying they're doing it all wrong is quite rude.

I had one reviewer inform me that racism was an invention of the 19th and 20th centuries and that people were far more accepting of other races back in the 18th century!!!

Yeeeeaaahhh...cause there was no racism at ALL in slavery... ::)
Beyond a wholesome discipline, be gentle with yourself. You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars.  You have a right to be here. Be cheerful, strive to be happy. -Desiderata

Slartibartfast

  • Member
  • Posts: 10801
    • Nerdy Necklaces - my Etsy shop!
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1147 on: August 18, 2013, 10:28:35 PM »
I had one reviewer inform me that racism was an invention of the 19th and 20th centuries and that people were far more accepting of other races back in the 18th century!!!

Yeeeeaaahhh...cause there was no racism at ALL in slavery... ::)

Nah, racism itself isn't new, it's just the "feeling bad about it" part that is  ::)

sweet_basil

  • Member
  • Posts: 19
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1148 on: August 19, 2013, 12:58:28 PM »
I don't like historical fiction that reads like it's people playing dress-up. I do not want to read a book that takes place in 17th century Italy (for example) and have the characters use modern slang or have names that people in 17th century Italy wouldn't have! Another peeve is the "Ice Maiden" type characters, the ones who act all cold and Female Dog to everyone until something happens (usually the love interest saves her)  she starts to "defrost" and she starts acting nice.

Slartibartfast

  • Member
  • Posts: 10801
    • Nerdy Necklaces - my Etsy shop!
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1149 on: August 19, 2013, 01:20:48 PM »
I don't like historical fiction that reads like it's people playing dress-up. I do not want to read a book that takes place in 17th century Italy (for example) and have the characters use modern slang or have names that people in 17th century Italy wouldn't have! Another peeve is the "Ice Maiden" type characters, the ones who act all cold and Female Dog to everyone until something happens (usually the love interest saves her)  she starts to "defrost" and she starts acting nice.

Ah, see, I can totally get behind the "ice maiden" archetype as long as it's a necessity - usually because the female character is doing something unusual for a woman to do, and people won't take her seriously otherwise.  ("Unusual" can be as simple as running her own business in a male-dominated industry, but usually in the books I read it's a historical context and she's managing the family finances, championing some cause, or just flat-out standing her ground against the people in her life who want to steamroll over her objections and opinions.)  I guess that's totally different than "Female Dog because she doesn't know any differently," though  :-\

Barney girl

  • Member
  • Posts: 350
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1150 on: August 19, 2013, 05:39:30 PM »
Since we're on fanfiction and reviewers of such-

I'm not sure what's worse/funnier, the guy who reviewed one of my slash fics with "that's so g*y", or the chick to went and reviewed another slash fic of mine with a complaint about how horrible people were to be writing non-canon ships, as well as a list of ships that were canon and therefor acceptable*.

I was reading some fanfic that was clearly labeled as AU (alternate universe) and changed the fundamental nature of the relationship between two of the main characters. The writer had a whole series of these stories. Personally, they didn't work for me, but I love how creative and freeform fanfic can be, so I was cool with the basic idea. Why not try it, right? Well, another person who read them posted increasingly negative comments on them--basically, they just couldn't see that relationship actually happening that way, and since the writer had "some talent," they should really just try writing the relationship as it was in canon.  :o

I thought that was a pretty awful thing to say, about free stories that no one has to read.

Agreed.  I mean Pirates of the Caribbean is my fandom and both my bff and I like the shippings as the were in the movies.  Will with Elizabeth and neither of us care for "Sparrabeth".  But because of that, we just don't read it! If it says in the summary that's what ship the author's going with, we don't click on it! It's that easy!

I've come across authors having "Challenges" from other authors, and my friend did one, I think writing Jack as he'd react to a certain situation, and it turned out to be funny while keeping him in character.  I think challenges can be fun and good for stretching one's writing muscles, but rudely insisting someone write a character into certain situations or implying they're doing it all wrong is quite rude.

I had one reviewer inform me that racism was an invention of the 19th and 20th centuries and that people were far more accepting of other races back in the 18th century!!!

Yeeeeaaahhh...cause there was no racism at ALL in slavery... ::)

Doesn't that depend which slavery you are talking about? As I understand it most slavery in history has nothing to do with race, but is about relative power.
In relation to racism I did read something (I couldn't now tell you where, but it would be probably be a BBC Radio 4 programme) which made the point that as the anti-slavery movement gained strength, so did racism as the those in the slave trade brought in quasi-scientific arguments to attempt to justify why there was nothing morally wrong with what they were doing.

VorFemme

  • Member
  • Posts: 14036
  • It's too darned hot! (song from Kiss Me, Kate)
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1151 on: August 19, 2013, 05:54:13 PM »
Romans held slaves based on who had lost the last war....i.e. NON-Romans.

Other countries, races, etc. held slaves based on much the same thing - someone taken in battle or captured after a battle was lost, as part of the "looting & pillaging" thing that was how most soldiers got PAID - the Romans paid them, "looting & pillaging" was by way of being their combat pay or bonus.....and selling captives as slaves was part of it.
Let sleeping dragons be.......morning breath......need I explain?

Piratelvr1121

  • Member
  • Posts: 9123
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1152 on: August 19, 2013, 06:18:25 PM »
Since we're on fanfiction and reviewers of such-

I'm not sure what's worse/funnier, the guy who reviewed one of my slash fics with "that's so g*y", or the chick to went and reviewed another slash fic of mine with a complaint about how horrible people were to be writing non-canon ships, as well as a list of ships that were canon and therefor acceptable*.

I was reading some fanfic that was clearly labeled as AU (alternate universe) and changed the fundamental nature of the relationship between two of the main characters. The writer had a whole series of these stories. Personally, they didn't work for me, but I love how creative and freeform fanfic can be, so I was cool with the basic idea. Why not try it, right? Well, another person who read them posted increasingly negative comments on them--basically, they just couldn't see that relationship actually happening that way, and since the writer had "some talent," they should really just try writing the relationship as it was in canon.  :o

I thought that was a pretty awful thing to say, about free stories that no one has to read.

Agreed.  I mean Pirates of the Caribbean is my fandom and both my bff and I like the shippings as the were in the movies.  Will with Elizabeth and neither of us care for "Sparrabeth".  But because of that, we just don't read it! If it says in the summary that's what ship the author's going with, we don't click on it! It's that easy!

I've come across authors having "Challenges" from other authors, and my friend did one, I think writing Jack as he'd react to a certain situation, and it turned out to be funny while keeping him in character.  I think challenges can be fun and good for stretching one's writing muscles, but rudely insisting someone write a character into certain situations or implying they're doing it all wrong is quite rude.

I had one reviewer inform me that racism was an invention of the 19th and 20th centuries and that people were far more accepting of other races back in the 18th century!!!

Yeeeeaaahhh...cause there was no racism at ALL in slavery... ::)

Doesn't that depend which slavery you are talking about? As I understand it most slavery in history has nothing to do with race, but is about relative power.
In relation to racism I did read something (I couldn't now tell you where, but it would be probably be a BBC Radio 4 programme) which made the point that as the anti-slavery movement gained strength, so did racism as the those in the slave trade brought in quasi-scientific arguments to attempt to justify why there was nothing morally wrong with what they were doing.

Well there wasn't really slavery so much in my story but I was thinking of the practice of using Africans as slaves by colonists/Americans up till the Civil War.
Beyond a wholesome discipline, be gentle with yourself. You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars.  You have a right to be here. Be cheerful, strive to be happy. -Desiderata

Elfmama

  • Member
  • Posts: 4595
  • Derailing threads since 2001!
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1153 on: August 19, 2013, 07:52:16 PM »
Romans held slaves based on who had lost the last war....i.e. NON-Romans.

Other countries, races, etc. held slaves based on much the same thing - someone taken in battle or captured after a battle was lost, as part of the "looting & pillaging" thing that was how most soldiers got PAID - the Romans paid them, "looting & pillaging" was by way of being their combat pay or bonus.....and selling captives as slaves was part of it.
And I think it was ... Plato?  Socrates? One of the Greek philosophers said that the concept of slavery was the height of civilization.  His thought was that when you conquered another tribe/nation/city-state, you killed all of the men of warrior age.  And then what would happen to their women and children?  Why, they'd just starve to death without men to take care of them.  It was uncivilized to leave the poor things there to die.  You took them home with you and took care of them.  And in return for your feeding and clothing and caring for them when they were ill, it was reasonable to expect them to work for you.  Race didn't come into it at all, as usually they were your neighbors and the same race as you.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Common sense is not a gift, but a curse.  Because then
you have to deal with all the people who don't have it.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

Jocelyn

  • Member
  • Posts: 2013
Re: Reading/Book Pet Peeves
« Reply #1154 on: August 19, 2013, 09:23:55 PM »
Racial justification for slavery pretty much arose in America after the concept of 'white' was developed. Prior to the colonization of the US, people didn't think of themselves as white- they were English, or Irish, or French or German. There was no collective category of 'Europeans'; they saw huge differences between the nationalities. It was only after they arrived in North America, started intermingling, and interacting with people who were of different colors, that the idea that there was a group called 'whites' arose....and the idea that it was morally, intellectually and physically superior to other groups, and destined to conquer, exile or enslave people of other colors. So while for the majority of history, color had nothing to do with slavery, it's been an inherent part of the history of slavery in the US. And Britain, too...check out Kipling's ideas about the White Man's Burden. ::)