Author Topic: And for dessert....  (Read 3653 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hawkwatcher

  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2818
Re: And for dessert....
« Reply #15 on: January 14, 2007, 04:30:07 PM »
I could see hosts having a similar event to raise money for charity or for a political candidate.  However, it does not sound like the hostess in this case was trying to raise money for charity and, if she was trying to raise money for charity, she should have notified her guests ahead of time so that they could decline her invitation.

Had I attended this event, I would have been horribly offended.  Not only would my husband and I have left, but I would refuse any invitation from this "hostess" in the future.   

Pixie

  • Guest
Re: And for dessert....
« Reply #16 on: January 14, 2007, 08:08:10 PM »
No, thank you.

Agreed,  I would have cut that hostess out of my life.


Sharnita

  • Super Hero!
  • ****
  • Posts: 21462
Re: And for dessert....
« Reply #17 on: January 18, 2007, 11:14:54 AM »
I'm the kind of berson who would be disappointed that my "dessert" didn'y involve ice cream and hot fudge. I would probably opt out and hit DQ on the way home.

ccnumber4

  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2048
Re: And for dessert....
« Reply #18 on: January 18, 2007, 11:22:42 AM »
<<<Interestingly enough, most of the wives who got dessert that night are no longer the wives of the gentlemen "marks".>>>

I thought the original post said that the conversation regarded a party that was held the week before?? 

And the marriages have already dissolved?  That was quick. 

ccnumber4

  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2048
Re: And for dessert....
« Reply #19 on: January 18, 2007, 11:23:17 AM »
Ah, understanding now!