Author Topic: I'm not. Really  (Read 7349 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

blue2000

  • It is never too late to be what you might have been
  • Super Hero!
  • ****
  • Posts: 6403
  • Two kitties - No waiting. And no sleeping either.
Re: I'm not. Really
« Reply #60 on: January 05, 2007, 05:33:43 PM »
If I remember correctly, it's because some really inappropriate ads pop up when you use that word in a post. Whole threads had to be deleted because of this. :-X
You are only young once. After that you have to think up some other excuse.

Ko-Ko

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 586
  • Oh my giddy aunt!
Re: I'm not. Really
« Reply #61 on: January 05, 2007, 07:21:20 PM »
Thanks for the suggestions everyone. I'll probably just try my best to ignore him, but if that doesn't work, I can probably find something stereotypical about him to show how ridiculous he is. Hmm, he does spend a lot of time in the bathroom... Ew! I meant he is always fixing his hair! Get those perverted minds out of the gutter!  ;)
I've got 'em on the list--I've got 'em on the list;
               And they'll none of 'em be missed--they'll none of
                    'em be missed.
*************************************

Don't end up on my list ;)

housewife2k

  • Super Hero!
  • ****
  • Posts: 7659
  • I want to be a Pirate AND a Ninja!
Re: I'm not. Really
« Reply #62 on: January 07, 2007, 03:28:00 PM »
I am guessing the reason bisexual isnt filtered is because it is a scientific term, its counterparts being heterosexual and homosexual

g@y, probably bc it is the most commonly used (of the 3) as an offensive term, whereas 'lesbian' isnt used as an insult...

just guessing.

Someone in my highschool was trying to use 'lesbian' as an insult, but kept getting it confused with 'thespian'. He couldn't understand why my group of friends-most of whom were bisexual or lesbian, found it so humerous. Well, lets see-calling us actors isn't insulting, and statements of fact aren't insulting...hmmmmm