News: IT'S THE 2ND ANNUAL GUATEMALA LIBRARY PROJECT BOOK DRIVE!    LOOKING FOR DONATIONS OF SCIENCE BOOKS THIS YEAR.    Check it out in the "Extending the Hand of Kindness" folder or here: http://www.etiquettehell.com/smf/index.php?topic=139832.msg3372084#msg3372084   

  • October 17, 2017, 07:54:05 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74  (Read 3605371 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ereine

  • Member
  • Posts: 943
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3795 on: May 31, 2013, 10:09:56 AM »
This may end up ruining a designer's career.

Marimekko is somewhat famous internationally for really colorful and large prints, in Finland they're everywhere. One of their designers, the daughter of possibly their most famous designer, has admitted to using a Ukranian artist's painting in one of her fabric designs. It was found out when there was a news story about how that design had been chosen to be painted on an airplane and a reader recognised it from a book on Ukranian folk art he had bought in 1960s. I wonder what they're going to do to the plane now.
Quote
“I didn’t think about copyright or that I appropriated someone else’s creative work. “Forest folk” felt so close to me and I wanted to share that forest feeling with as many people as possible,” she said.
In that case, you contact the original artist and pay her for the use of her designs.  This was a folk-style design with a known artist, not a traditional folk design that is in the public domain.

At least she didn't try to griggs her way out.
Sorry but Google has failed me - what does the bolded mean? Did you make it up?  ???

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooks_Source_infringement_controversy

Reika

  • Member
  • Posts: 3172
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3796 on: May 31, 2013, 10:10:23 AM »
This may end up ruining a designer's career.

Marimekko is somewhat famous internationally for really colorful and large prints, in Finland they're everywhere. One of their designers, the daughter of possibly their most famous designer, has admitted to using a Ukranian artist's painting in one of her fabric designs. It was found out when there was a news story about how that design had been chosen to be painted on an airplane and a reader recognised it from a book on Ukranian folk art he had bought in 1960s. I wonder what they're going to do to the plane now.
Quote
“I didn’t think about copyright or that I appropriated someone else’s creative work. “Forest folk” felt so close to me and I wanted to share that forest feeling with as many people as possible,” she said.
In that case, you contact the original artist and pay her for the use of her designs.  This was a folk-style design with a known artist, not a traditional folk design that is in the public domain.

At least she didn't try to griggs her way out.
Sorry but Google has failed me - what does the bolded mean? Did you make it up?  ???

I think this is what she means: http://www.soslang.com/term/griggs

TeamBhakta

  • Member
  • Posts: 1627
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3797 on: May 31, 2013, 11:25:03 AM »
I was using coupons at a grocery store. The cashier said he had to get the manager and a key to ring them up. So he and a girl at customer service decided to spend a couple minutes goofing with each other by hollering back and forth (and occasionally over the phone / intercom) "Go get the key. I don't want to. You do it. You go get (manager)." Which really ticked me off. And then Customer Service Girl finally dragged her butt over to the register. But not to give him the key. Nope. The cashier told me she was a lazy girl.  Customer Service Girl told him "I just didn't feel like doing it." She turned to me and said "I didn't want to 'cuz I'm high." And she was not kidding either. Erratic movements, glassy eyes, slurry speech, the whole shebang  :o Then she shuffled off. The manager showed up after that with the key. I emailed the corporate office when I got home. Haven't heard back from them yet
*ETA: I asked the cashier twice if anyone was coming with the key
« Last Edit: May 31, 2013, 11:26:45 AM by TeamBhakta »

Amara

  • Member
  • Posts: 2134
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3798 on: May 31, 2013, 11:35:10 AM »
Please update us when you hear, TeamBhakta!

Shalamar

  • Member
  • Posts: 297
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3799 on: May 31, 2013, 11:37:08 AM »
WOW.   :o

ica171

  • Member
  • Posts: 566
    • Must Add Fabric Softener
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3800 on: May 31, 2013, 12:04:05 PM »
I hope you let the manager know, too. Although with some stores the manager's response is less than enthusiastic until they get corporate breathing down their neck.

z_squared82

  • Member
  • Posts: 601
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3801 on: May 31, 2013, 02:23:51 PM »
My first job was at a Mom-and-Pop bakery. I only worked two days during the school year, three days when school was out. They had three locations, all in my area of town. The donuts, bread, coffee cakes, etc., were baked at Location A. The baked goods meant to stock Locations B and C were driven there very early in the morning. The men dropping off the baked goods were also in charge of picking up the cash and checks from the previous day.

Over the course of the 15 months I worked there, I think the driver stole the previous day’s take more than a dozen times. I don’t know if it was always the same driver, I certainly hope not, but all my 16-year-old self could think was, “Why can’t they hire an honest driver?”

I think the older couple just didn’t care anymore. He had cancer, she liked to gamble. The business closed while I was in high school. Too bad, too. They had the best glazed yeast donuts in town.

bloo

  • Member
  • Posts: 1243
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3802 on: June 02, 2013, 12:32:26 PM »
Ten to one it's Comic Sans.

This literally made me LOL, Diane. And made me think of this:

http://www.passiveaggressivenotes.com/2010/07/19/the-53rd-annual-punctuation-posse-round-up/

Second picture down.  ;D

Winterlight

  • On the internet, no one can tell you're a dog- arf.
  • Member
  • Posts: 10073
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3803 on: June 02, 2013, 06:43:01 PM »
This may end up ruining a designer's career.

Marimekko is somewhat famous internationally for really colorful and large prints, in Finland they're everywhere. One of their designers, the daughter of possibly their most famous designer, has admitted to using a Ukranian artist's painting in one of her fabric designs. It was found out when there was a news story about how that design had been chosen to be painted on an airplane and a reader recognised it from a book on Ukranian folk art he had bought in 1960s. I wonder what they're going to do to the plane now.

I didn’t think about copyright or that I appropriated someone else’s creative work.

Translated- I stole it and don't care except that I got caught.
If wisdom’s ways you wisely seek,
Five things observe with care,
To whom you speak,
Of whom you speak,
And how, and when, and where.
Caroline Lake Ingalls

Reader

  • Member
  • Posts: 575
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3804 on: June 04, 2013, 11:55:00 AM »
I think one of my current renter's R is committing PD currently.  He works for an agency run by my state.  At the beginning of his employment he signed an employment contract/agreement which goes over the rules and firable offenses.  R recently violated a work rule, a possible firable offense, and now has a disciplinary meeting with his union steward and his supervisor this Wednesday and is not allowed to work until the outcome of that meeting.

z_squared82

  • Member
  • Posts: 601
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3805 on: June 04, 2013, 03:36:51 PM »
At the media outlet I used to work for, there were several jobs that required frequent driving. Sales, reporters, photographers, etc. One such person had evidently had a DUI but it was a first offense, so he could still drive for work (or whatever those rules are).

Well, he had to go to a probation hearing. His *own* probation hearing – for that DUI. Dingbat shows up drunk. We aren’t even given an option to find a work-around, corporate (via the employee handbook) required he be fired immediately and we spent the rest of the day (week, month, year, as they refused to replace him) scrambling to cover his work.

CharlieBraun

  • Member
  • Posts: 599
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3806 on: June 04, 2013, 03:56:24 PM »
At the media outlet I used to work for, there were several jobs that required frequent driving. Sales, reporters, photographers, etc. One such person had evidently had a DUI but it was a first offense, so he could still drive for work (or whatever those rules are).

Well, he had to go to a probation hearing. His *own* probation hearing – for that DUI. Dingbat shows up drunk. We aren’t even given an option to find a work-around, corporate (via the employee handbook) required he be fired immediately and we spent the rest of the day (week, month, year, as they refused to replace him) scrambling to cover his work.

A friend of mine was a regular speaker at MADD meetings, where we used to live.  The county where we lived mandated that anyone convicted of a DUI in any form had to attend a MADD impact-statement meeting.  Everyone had to be registered, had to be signed in and signed out when they left.  And breathalyzed.  The only acceptable reading was 0.00 .

She told me that at least four people at every one of these events (which were held about every month and had about 200 mandated attendees) were over the legal drinking limit.  If I didn't know her to be a completely truthful person, I would have had some doubts.   But it was true - some attendees drank while on their way to a mandated legal consequence for breaking the law when drinking.

Mind boggle.
"We ate the pies."

Shalamar

  • Member
  • Posts: 297
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3807 on: June 04, 2013, 04:00:36 PM »
When my daughter was taking Driver's Ed at school, the instructor gave the usual lecture about how the only blood-alcohol level the police would accept was 0.0 (until the driver reached a certain age - 21, I think).    The mother of one of the kids put up her hand and said "My son likes to have a few beers when he goes to parties.  He can still drive afterwards, right?"  The instructor somehow managed to not roll her eyes and said "No.  0.0 means no alcohol, period."  "Oh.  But just one would be okay, right?"   ::)

Iris

  • Member
  • Posts: 3252
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3808 on: June 04, 2013, 04:35:18 PM »
When my daughter was taking Driver's Ed at school, the instructor gave the usual lecture about how the only blood-alcohol level the police would accept was 0.0 (until the driver reached a certain age - 21, I think).    The mother of one of the kids put up her hand and said "My son likes to have a few beers when he goes to parties.  He can still drive afterwards, right?"  The instructor somehow managed to not roll her eyes and said "No.  0.0 means no alcohol, period."  "Oh.  But just one would be okay, right?"   ::)

Does she want the short answer or the long answer?
"Can't do anything with children, can you?" the woman said.

Poirot thought you could, but forebore to say so.

KarenK

  • Member
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #3809 on: June 04, 2013, 04:48:24 PM »
Just read an email exchange that looks like a combo of potential PD and plain demanding snowflakeyness...

PD: The company I work for provides a service to clients. We're in the process of taking on a new client. The client project manager just replied to a request email for information scolding by our Project Manager for asking for information that had apparently already been provided (he's a new project manager here, and new on the project and probably did make a mistake by not asking for all the information from our side first, so that particular fault was a genuine complaint that our PM should have avoided).

But the snowflakey bit came when the client PM also included a very scolding diatribe about how it looked unprofessional to have all the emails in the email reply chain in different fonts, so she had reformatted all the emails below her reply into one font, and demanded we comply with that as well in all future communication, or she would be looking for a new service provider. So when replying to her or just emailing her anything, we are expected to change the font we use for all our company communication to match her font in her emails.

That's a whole new level of demanding.

I don't know, is this client going to be worth the hassle?

Survey Says NO!
We have no choice in the matter. Management says to bring them on board and work with them, no matter how demanding or rediculous they are. <shrug>

Did she actually specify that her font be used? Because it would be fairly easy to just select all and change everything to the same font of your choice. Every time. Every reply - including hers.

Come to think of it, how would you know for sure what font she uses? What if you don't have that particular font?

Ten to one it's Comic Sans.

Everything is better in Comic Sans!