News: IT'S THE 2ND ANNUAL GUATEMALA LIBRARY PROJECT BOOK DRIVE!    LOOKING FOR DONATIONS OF SCIENCE BOOKS THIS YEAR.    Check it out in the "Extending the Hand of Kindness" folder or here: http://www.etiquettehell.com/smf/index.php?topic=139832.msg3372084#msg3372084   

  • October 17, 2017, 09:54:52 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74  (Read 3605717 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

jedikaiti

  • Swiss Army Nerd
  • Member
  • Posts: 2771
  • A pie in the hand is worth two in the mail.
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5895 on: June 25, 2014, 01:18:55 PM »
Oh my dear and fluffy $Diety! Someone is in Trouble!
What part of v_e = \sqrt{\frac{2GM}{r}} don't you understand? It's only rocket science!

"The problem with re-examining your brilliant ideas is that more often than not, you discover they are the intellectual equivalent of saying, 'Hold my beer and watch this!'" - Cindy Couture

Katana_Geldar

  • Member
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5896 on: June 25, 2014, 06:58:41 PM »
I'm currently seeing a psychologist through a Medicare mental health plan, I get six appointments and claim quite a bit of money back from Medicare after I pay the account in full. The claim usually takes a few days to come through after I mail it, but I mailed it Friday and should have received the refund by now.

I was checking my bank statement yesterday and the amount hadn't gone in, not unusual as it might have been held up, but I noticed a lesser amount billed to my doctor on the day that I paid and not to the psychologist as had been previously done.

So I queried it, turns out that one of the guys in the office had billed the wrong amount to the wrong EFTPOS machine. I didn't check the receipt as I thought it was all above board, so now I have to go in and pay the rest today and they have to make sure the psychologist gets paid.

Refund still hasn't come through, but they told me to call back Monday.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2014, 07:14:27 PM by Katana_Geldar »

iridaceae

  • Boring in real life as well
  • Member
  • Posts: 3573
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5897 on: June 26, 2014, 05:52:16 AM »


So I queried it, turns out that one of the guys in the office had billed the wrong amount to the wrong EFTPOS machine. I didn't check the receipt as I thought it was all above board, so now I have to go in and pay the rest today and they have to make sure the psychologist gets paid.

I'm curious as to why this is PD; sounds like an honest mistake.
Nothing to see here.

Adelaide

  • Member
  • Posts: 644
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5898 on: June 27, 2014, 12:08:33 PM »
My supervisor assigned me Very Urgent Task #1, which he wants completed at the end of the day and includes 191 separate entries on a sheet. Yesterday he asked me if that was possible and said our boss really, really wanted it by the end of the day today. I told him point-blank that if this was the only thing I had to work on, I might be able to do it if I came in early. I came in early and got to work.

Lo and behold, by the time I was on entry #20 he approached me with another task. A third party needs a document but the description they gave my supervisor matches about 75 documents. My supervisor actually wanted me to stop what I was doing, download all of the matching documents, put them together, and send them to him. Instead I compiled a list with descriptions (which took some time itself!) and sent them to him, emphasizing several times and in various ways that it was a lot of information and it made no sense for me to just gather up everything and the kitchen sink and take out a huge chunk of time. So far he'd refused all of my attempts to get any sort of clarification as to the specific document he needed me to find, and I don't have a point of contact for the person this is going to. Finally, after I again said "It will be over an hour before I can get all of these done" that he said "Oh, I can call them and get them to clarify which document they need."  >:(

greencat

  • Member
  • Posts: 3899
  • Trap...Neuter...What was that third thing again?
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5899 on: June 27, 2014, 12:54:32 PM »
I always used to send an email asking if the new task took priority over the Very Important Task that I was previously told was #1 and I shouldn't work on anything else.  Get it in writing that they wanted you to interrupt doing that thing to do something else...

Adelaide

  • Member
  • Posts: 644
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5900 on: June 27, 2014, 01:41:13 PM »
I always used to send an email asking if the new task took priority over the Very Important Task that I was previously told was #1 and I shouldn't work on anything else.  Get it in writing that they wanted you to interrupt doing that thing to do something else...

We sit next to each other and are in constant verbal and email communication.

ladyknight1

  • Member
  • Posts: 11805
  • Not all those who wander are lost
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5901 on: June 27, 2014, 01:48:22 PM »
Oh. My.

My big boss is really bad about springing major projects two days before the deadline and with no prior notice. I have weekly duties that take 60-75% of my time, without her projects.
ďAll that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost."
-J.R.R Tolkien

bopper

  • Member
  • Posts: 13995
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5902 on: June 27, 2014, 11:20:12 PM »

Anyhow, back to actual PD stories, a teacher in one of my brother's classes (back in junior high) apparently hit a student with her shoe when he was misbehaving. The teacher's excuse was that she was having a diabetic episode. Most people with diabetes or hypoglycemia that I know would not have anywhere near enough energy to take off a shoe and hit a second person in the head with it during an episode (of either sugar being too high or too low). Not sure what happened to the teacher.


My DH is diabetic and before you have no energy there is a phase where I find their emotions to be "amplified"...if they are happy they are really happy and if they are annoyed they are really annoyed.

Hillia

  • Member
  • Posts: 3357
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5903 on: June 27, 2014, 11:27:40 PM »
Governmental PD.  The county where I live has a 5 member board of county commissioners.  A few years ago, Party A swept the elections and took over the board, and set about handing out offices and contracts like Halloween candy from the dollar store.  We just (after 10 months) stopped paying the country treasurer who is under investigation for not doing her job (really not doing her job - like not depositing property tax checks or providing proper funds for county schools, libraries, etc).

Now the latest story.  A few years ago, a developer wanted to put in a housing development.  He was promised all sorts of tax breaks, county-funded road construction, etc, in a series of not quite shady deals with the commissioners.  For some reason, the deal went sour, so he sued the county.  The commissioners held a meeting with the developer and his attorney, came to a settlement for nearly $700k (a major, major chunk of change for a rural area) to be funded by a new tax, and proudly announced how they had avoided the cost of a lawsuit.  The local rabblerousing independent newspaper said, 'Wait...the developer's attorney was in the meeting but not the county attorney?  And it was not announced or made open to the public?  That's a violation of county law' and filed suit to have the settlement overturned.  The commissioners are now falling all over themselves issuing retractions: 'Oh, did we say the developer's attorney was there?  We meant wasn't.  N't.  N't'

Jocelyn

  • Member
  • Posts: 2013
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5904 on: June 27, 2014, 11:42:32 PM »

Anyhow, back to actual PD stories, a teacher in one of my brother's classes (back in junior high) apparently hit a student with her shoe when he was misbehaving. The teacher's excuse was that she was having a diabetic episode. Most people with diabetes or hypoglycemia that I know would not have anywhere near enough energy to take off a shoe and hit a second person in the head with it during an episode (of either sugar being too high or too low). Not sure what happened to the teacher.


My DH is diabetic and before you have no energy there is a phase where I find their emotions to be "amplified"...if they are happy they are really happy and if they are annoyed they are really annoyed.
There are many different kinds of reactions. The first man I ever saw, was when I was working in a gift shop at Christmastime: he started to cry, tears rolling down his cheeks, without sobbing. My former pastor would get very irritable and snappish; my father would get childlike. Me, I have a strong desire to lie down, preferably in a cold place (tile floor rather than carpet, for example), and I often will become very clumsy at this stage. However, I often have an 'aura' of being extremely irritated about insignificant things. But that also happens if I'm high, so that's not a reliable symptom.

The basic rules, for those around a diabetic is that they're going to act unlike their usual self. They will do something odd, like lie down on the floor at the health club.
Do not ask them if they're OK and accept their assurance that they are. (but if they say they're not, you know something very important!) Higher thought tends to go first, so assume that they're not able to accurately assess what's going on. If you're not sure the person is a diabetic, ask them if they are: they'll generally be able to remember that fact. Ask when was the last time they tested their blood glucose, if they have a meter with them, and if they do, get them to test. The further the number is below 100, the more serious the hypoglycemia is. If it's below 70, call an ambulance. If it's 70-90, offer them about half a glass of juice or regular soda. Do not use chocolate- the fat in chocolate makes the sugar digest slowly. Candy that's pure sugar like candy corn, or hard candies like Life Savers, work quicker, but liquids are best/quickest. They don't need to drink a lot of juice or soda- too much can set off another swing in blood glucose. If they don't have a meter with them, give them the liquid anyway, and get them to an urgent care or ER, or to wherever their meter is. Diabetics will act wonky if their sugar is too high, but high sugar is not the life-threatening emergency that low sugar is. If the bG drops to around 20, odds are very good that the person is going to die or have permanent brain damage. Better to raise their bG from 200 to 250, than to let it drop from 70 to 20.

violinp

  • Member
  • Posts: 3749
  • cabbagegirl28's my sister :)
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5905 on: June 27, 2014, 11:50:28 PM »
Well, a manager I've talked about previously on another thread is gone. She didn't exactly have the greatest morale (complaining when I asked to take my break or leave, plus playing on her phone instead of talking to customers), but what took the cake was when she took home an expensive object from Lost and Found and refused to answer phone calls asking her to bring it back - even from a fellow manager! :o. Of course, the owner of said object was not pleased to find out that her object was not in our possession.

Manager brought the object back the next day, and didn't understand all the fuss. After all, she'd done it before and brought the other object back...

Yeah, she suddenly found herself unemployed. She was replaced by four people who are far more competent and kind than she could ever hope to be.
"It takes a great deal of courage to stand up to your enemies, but even more to stand up to your friends" - Harry Potter


LeeLee88

  • Member
  • Posts: 2161
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5906 on: June 28, 2014, 06:39:35 AM »
We've been having a whole slew of these this week.  It's mainly been people who either don't show up to work, or will show up very late with excuses like, "I was up late".  Okey doke then.  The one who's really taking the cake lately is person who, when a supervisor is giving instruction to another worker, will interrupt the supervisor and talk over said supervisor to tell the co-worker what he/she should really be doing.  Which is just great, considering Talky Todd has never done what we we do before, and is still in training himself. 

Talky Todd also performed his set tasks incorrectly, and when politlely asked to re-do the work, said he knew they were wrong the whole time, just turned it in as a completed product anyway.  Uhhhh... why?!  Supervisor attempting to help Talky Todd learn his appropriate tasks is talked over and argued with until Supervisor gives up and says, "Fine, you know everything, I'll let Higher Supervisor know that everything you do can get sent to him, and he can take care of it."  Higher Supervisor does not tolerate fools, and Talky Todd has been digging his own employment grave since his first day, which is when he first interrupted his primary Supervisor to tell a subordinate what to do. 

Oh, Talky Todd also told a co-worker that because he's so intelligent and well-read, most people are very intimidated by him.  Seriously, Todd?  Seriously.

KenveeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 8863
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5907 on: June 28, 2014, 10:25:43 AM »
When you're an intern, particularly in a field with a very tough job market, that's your chance to show what a good worker you are and why the company should hire you instead of the thirty other people applying for the same spot. It's not the time to just not show up for work on the day of a special event, leaving the director of the event to work the registration table because the interns aren't there.

Reika

  • Member
  • Posts: 3172
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5908 on: June 28, 2014, 11:13:04 AM »
Ouch KenveeB.

The place mom goes to for the oil changes had a case of PD from an entire crew. They weren't putting in the right size oil filters, instead they were jamming ones that were too large, in some cases clearly using some sort of tool to force them into place. Unfortunately, our car is one of the ones that were affected.

Fortunately, that crew is gone, they gave us a discount on the current oil change and will have us come back to do the replacement and such when the needed items come in. Thankfully nothing was damaged so the car is operable.

FauxFoodist

  • Member
  • Posts: 4983
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5909 on: June 28, 2014, 12:50:21 PM »
Ouch KenveeB.

The place mom goes to for the oil changes had a case of PD from an entire crew. They weren't putting in the right size oil filters, instead they were jamming ones that were too large, in some cases clearly using some sort of tool to force them into place. Unfortunately, our car is one of the ones that were affected.

Fortunately, that crew is gone, they gave us a discount on the current oil change and will have us come back to do the replacement and such when the needed items come in. Thankfully nothing was damaged so the car is operable.

This would be a good example of why I refuse to do any mystery shops involving letting someone work on my car.  I don't have the money to fix what might go wrong letting an unknown work on my car so it's totally not worth it to pick these up.  I'm surprised that so many mystery shoppers are willing to take this risk, especially when I hear so many bad things, in general, about some of these particular chains.