News: IMPORTANT UPDATE REGARDING SITE IN FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT FOLDER.

  • May 22, 2018, 07:17:04 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74  (Read 4286920 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Garden Goblin

  • Member
  • Posts: 722
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5565 on: April 25, 2014, 09:36:20 AM »
Job interviews are a two way street.  They tell the company if the employee is a good fit, and tell the employee if the company is a good fit.

Anyone fussing about how I mix pepper into my ketchup is probably a micro-manager who reads too many trite 'advice' books, and I certainly never want to work with another of those.

ladyknight1

  • Member
  • Posts: 12217
  • Not all those who wander are lost
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5566 on: April 30, 2014, 02:55:30 PM »
Heisman trophy winner and Florida State University football player Jameis Winston has been charged with stealing crab legs and crawfish from a Publix grocery store.

This is PD because this young man does not yet have a $$ contract in professional football. We'll see how it plays out.

http://www.wesh.com/news/florida-state-qb-jameis-winston-accused-of-stealing-crab-legs-from-publix/25736390
ďAll that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost."
-J.R.R Tolkien

Lorelei_Evil

  • Member
  • Posts: 1782
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5567 on: April 30, 2014, 05:03:47 PM »
He got suspended from the baseball team.  There's that at least.

darling

  • Member
  • Posts: 225
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5568 on: May 01, 2014, 08:59:50 AM »
Here's one:

When your boss picks up an overnight shift because no one else can take it, if you work the morning shift that relieves said boss, you should probably make it a point to be on time, otherwise she is going to be all-worlds of ticked off, especially if she worked it two days in a row, in addition to most of her normal day shift as well (and is salaried).

Yes, that boss is me, and I am fuming.

Thing is, normally this wouldn't be an issue, except the other person who should be here accidentally overslept (she commutes, and is on her way). I'd still talk to him about being late (actually, by now, he's a no-show), but I wouldn't be as angry.

I hate the last couple of weeks of the semester... I'd give the person who decided to be open 24-hours a day during the last couple weeks of class a piece of my mind, except it was my idea.  ::)

MissRose

  • Member
  • Posts: 1698
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5569 on: May 01, 2014, 11:08:25 AM »
I overheard someone saying they have gotten complaints from agents who try to transfer callers to other departments who will do one of the  following: refuse to accept the call even though it is clear it is theirs, pick up the line and say nothing which forces the agent to call back to get someone who will pick up the line, and/or sending certain types of work/issues to departments that are not even trained to do the work.  If only we could have all of the work at my place, our managers are stricter compared to the other location!

NyaChan

  • Member
  • Posts: 3665
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5570 on: May 01, 2014, 04:37:47 PM »
I overheard someone saying they have gotten complaints from agents who try to transfer callers to other departments who will do one of the  following: refuse to accept the call even though it is clear it is theirs, pick up the line and say nothing which forces the agent to call back to get someone who will pick up the line, and/or sending certain types of work/issues to departments that are not even trained to do the work.  If only we could have all of the work at my place, our managers are stricter compared to the other location!

That drives me bonkers!  I'll get calls from other departments trying to transfer someone to me and they are supposed to explain the problem before they send the call.  A lot just send it over without any introduction of heads up which makes us look bad when I discover that the issue is solely the province of the other department and have to send it right back.  I figure those people just want to get rid of the call.  Then there are the incompetent people who do take the time to thoroughly explain what they need me to do.  Only what they want me to do is completely and entirely their job.  I don't have access to that information, I have no way to answer the question or do those actions for anyone.  It's not even nuanced - I handle content and substantive work for the clients we already have.  They handle getting more clients and the money.  And yet they sound shocked that the client was in fact already in the right place.

Katana_Geldar

  • Member
  • Posts: 1530
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5571 on: May 01, 2014, 07:45:27 PM »
I used to work on reception and a lot of the time when I transferred a call the person would know what it was about when I said their name. Sometimes I had to transfer to someone else when the actual person was out of the office and I always asked if it was something they could handle. And sometimes it was an irate person who needed someone else to yell at and I needed someone senior to handle it. Sometimes it wouldn't even be a call, it was an open plan office so I said there was an angry person that needed to be talked to.

alkira6

  • Member
  • Posts: 655
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5572 on: May 02, 2014, 12:49:57 PM »
I had a boss at a (very) short-lived job in college who was never "in".  It didn't matter what the issue was, she was NEVER in for phone calls.  I left before I saw the fallout, but from what I know of that office it couldn't have been pretty.

Sirius

  • Member
  • Posts: 9073
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5573 on: May 02, 2014, 03:30:53 PM »

That drives me bonkers!  I'll get calls from other departments trying to transfer someone to me and they are supposed to explain the problem before they send the call.  A lot just send it over without any introduction of heads up which makes us look bad when I discover that the issue is solely the province of the other department and have to send it right back.  I figure those people just want to get rid of the call.  Then there are the incompetent people who do take the time to thoroughly explain what they need me to do.  Only what they want me to do is completely and entirely their job.  I don't have access to that information, I have no way to answer the question or do those actions for anyone.  It's not even nuanced - I handle content and substantive work for the clients we already have.  They handle getting more clients and the money.  And yet they sound shocked that the client was in fact already in the right place.

I had a situation come up when I worked in a military hospital where someone was transferred to my number by accident (or maybe whoever transferred them just wanted to get rid of them.  I don't know.)  It was an ambulance driver who was there to pick up a patient, and he didn't know where in the hospital the patient was.  Unfortunately, it was at 7:30 in the morning, during most shift changes.  I tried to transfer his call to the places where he should have been transferred, e.g. the transportation people, or, failing that, the charge nurse.  No one was answering the phones.  The driver had always been polite and had thanked me for my help; finally, he called me back and said, "I hate to keep calling you, since I know you don't have anything to do with this, but no one else is answering their phone."  That time, between the two of us, we were able to figure out what floor the patient was on, and I was able to send him to the floor's nursing station.  I never heard from him again, so that must have worked. 

Because of where my department name was located on the "list of department phone numbers" the information desks had, I would often get calls for the transportation people (I was transcription.)  Some, like the ambulance driver, were polite.  Others were downright rude; one rude person asked me why I had answered the phone since I wasn't the department they needed.  Or something like that.  Like my phone only rang when it was for me.  Sheesh.

ladyknight1

  • Member
  • Posts: 12217
  • Not all those who wander are lost
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5574 on: May 02, 2014, 05:20:18 PM »
I hope she runs far and fast from that "opportunity".
ďAll that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost."
-J.R.R Tolkien

Lady Snowdon

  • Super cool awesome title
  • Member
  • Posts: 5793
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5575 on: May 02, 2014, 05:29:46 PM »
I overheard someone saying they have gotten complaints from agents who try to transfer callers to other departments who will do one of the  following: refuse to accept the call even though it is clear it is theirs, pick up the line and say nothing which forces the agent to call back to get someone who will pick up the line, and/or sending certain types of work/issues to departments that are not even trained to do the work.  If only we could have all of the work at my place, our managers are stricter compared to the other location!

That drives me bonkers!  I'll get calls from other departments trying to transfer someone to me and they are supposed to explain the problem before they send the call.  A lot just send it over without any introduction of heads up which makes us look bad when I discover that the issue is solely the province of the other department and have to send it right back.  I figure those people just want to get rid of the call.  Then there are the incompetent people who do take the time to thoroughly explain what they need me to do.  Only what they want me to do is completely and entirely their job.  I don't have access to that information, I have no way to answer the question or do those actions for anyone.  It's not even nuanced - I handle content and substantive work for the clients we already have.  They handle getting more clients and the money.  And yet they sound shocked that the client was in fact already in the right place.

I used to work for a major healthcare insurance company, and when you transferred a call to a different area of the company, you were supposed to stay on the line, introduce yourself and the caller, and tell the other customer service person what needed to happen on the call.  We used to get lots of transfers of "hey, this person needs to talk to you guys" and when we'd ask "who are they, what do they want, have you verified them?" we'd be met with "Oh, no, I have no idea."  Then how, pray tell, do you know they need to talk to us?  It turned out my department had developed a reputation for actually answering the phone when you called us, so everyone was dumping unwanted calls on us because they knew we'd pick up the phone.  Grrrr.  That didn't last long, once we got our manager involved. 

TeamBhakta

  • Member
  • Posts: 1167
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5576 on: May 02, 2014, 06:38:42 PM »
I was temporarily sent to a different store today. I knew one sample lady working there, but not a second one who was brand new. The new lady came up to my station, rearranged my equipment and said "You have to do things xyz way" (which I knew was wrong). I assumed she'd been brought in as the new lead & kept my mouth shut. But then she barked at me later "TeamBhakta! Why aren't you finished setting up yet ?!  >:(" So I ended up asking the one I knew "Is she your new lead or something ? She snapped at me and messed with my stuff." She told me "No, I'm the lead here. She isn't supposed to tell you what to do. She tried that with me and I set her straight." The new lady walked up a second time a few minutes afterwards and demanded "Are you finally set up yet ?" I told her in my female-dog-barely-restrained tone "OtherLady & I have it set up. We're good here."

NewLady randomly disappeared after a few minutes of work, came back without her work uniform & took down all her equipment. As she walked past my station, she told me in a bizarrely mellow, too spaced out tone (to the point I thought she'd possibly try to hurt herself or start screaming at me) "It was sooo nice working with you." I found out after she left she'd marched up to a department manager & angrily gave her orders. Huge mistake. Which apparently ended with our lead finding out, ripping NewLady a new one & NewLady claiming afterwards "I'm not feeling well. I must go home."

Slartibartfast

  • Member
  • Posts: 10801
    • Nerdy Necklaces - my Etsy shop!
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5577 on: May 05, 2014, 03:53:53 PM »
Black Milk.  Not sure I can really add to that article, but it's a good analysis of how NOT to deal with a company social media campaign.

(Short version: a clothing company - which has made a brand based on respecting women's bodies of all shapes and sizes - posts a "cute" photo which some people see as size-shaming.  The company social media team, instead of apologizing or addressing it, essentially say "lol unfollow us then" and ban a bunch of people trying to discuss the issue.)

mmswm

  • Member
  • Posts: 2293
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5578 on: May 05, 2014, 04:29:48 PM »
Here's one from when I worked for MajorBank:

Cash a $40,000 cashier's check without calling to verify it.  Have check turn out to be a (very good) counterfeit with the original already cashed. Bank is out $40k and you're out of a job.
Some people lift weights.  I lift measures.  It's a far more esoteric workout. - (Quoted from a personal friend)

Cherry91

  • Member
  • Posts: 611
Re: Professional Darwinism: Update to OP on p.74
« Reply #5579 on: May 05, 2014, 04:56:31 PM »
Black Milk.  Not sure I can really add to that article, but it's a good analysis of how NOT to deal with a company social media campaign.

(Short version: a clothing company - which has made a brand based on respecting women's bodies of all shapes and sizes - posts a "cute" photo which some people see as size-shaming.  The company social media team, instead of apologizing or addressing it, essentially say "lol unfollow us then" and ban a bunch of people trying to discuss the issue.)

Oh, that's disappointing, I was planning on getting one of their Mass Effect N7 dresses when I had the money for a splurge. I think I'll save for an official Bioware N7 hoodie instead...
All will be well, and all manner of things will be well.